Who Was Melchizedek?
Who Was Melchizedek?
Who Was Melchizedek?
Melchizedek appears suddenly in Genesis 14 as “king of Salem” and “priest of God Most High.” He blesses Abraham and offers him bread and wine. In return, Abraham gives him a tenth of everything. Mysterious, right? But Jewish and early Christian tradition offers a clear and compelling explanation: Melchizedek was actually Shem, the son of Noah.
Here’s why that makes sense:
Their Lives Overlapped
According to Genesis, Noah lived 950 years and Shem 600. Abraham was born while both were still alive. Ancient sources like the Book of Jasher say Abraham lived with Noah and Shem for 39 years—learning directly from the men who had walked with God before the flood. These weren’t distant patriarchs—they were living mentors. Especially Shem, who became both a spiritual father and priestly figure in Abraham’s life.
A Priestly Line Before Levi
Long before the Levitical priesthood, Scripture shows a sacred line of priest-kings or prince-priests—righteous men who carried spiritual authority in their generation. The line goes: Adam → Seth → Enoch → Noah → Shem → Abraham. Each served as a kind of royal priest—walking with God, leading their families, and preserving divine knowledge.
In Genesis 14, Shem (as Melchizedek) publicly affirms Abraham as the next in this line, both by blessing him and receiving his tithe. It’s a transfer of spiritual legacy.
A Line of Faith
Abraham didn’t discover faith on his own. He inherited it. He was shaped by the firsthand testimonies of men like Noah—who had seen the world destroyed and remade by God’s word. Shem would’ve told stories passed directly down from Adam. There are only a few generational jumps between Adam and Abraham, and the knowledge of God wasn’t secondhand—it was fresh, lived, and trusted.
Abraham’s radical faith was birthed in a family culture that had walked with God for centuries.
These Families Lived Together
It’s not just plausible that these patriarchs knew each other—history and culture confirm it. While many descendants scattered or turned to other gods, the righteous line stayed together. They lived as extended families—sharing not just land, but memory, instruction, and sacred tradition.
Adam lived long enough to know Lamech, the father of Noah. Imagine Lamech sitting at Adam’s feet, hearing about Eden, the fall, and the mercy of God—directly from the man formed from dust. That kind of intimate, generational storytelling created a stronghold of faith that shaped everything that followed.
The story of God was not forgotten—it was lived and passed down.
What About “No Genealogy”?
Hebrews 7 describes Melchizedek as “without father or mother, without genealogy.” To modern Western readers, that sounds supernatural. But Jewish readers—especially in the first century—understood it differently. Genesis intentionally omits Melchizedek’s lineage, not because he had none, but to portray his priesthood as outside of tribal law.
This silence is symbolic—it sets up Melchizedek as a type of Christ, whose priesthood also isn’t based on ancestry, but divine appointment.
Ancient vs. Modern Thinking
First-century Jews—even today’s Orthodox Jews—would not hesitate to identify Melchizedek as Shem. That connection was assumed. But many modern Christians, shaped by Western logic, struggle with metaphors and multi-layered identities.
Eastern thought had no problem seeing Melchizedek as both Shem and a prophetic symbol of Christ. Scripture often does this—one figure can hold multiple meanings without contradiction.
Bottom Line
Melchizedek was Shem—the living patriarch, priest, and mentor who carried the knowledge of God from the world before the flood into the world after. In blessing Abraham, Shem passed on the mantle of spiritual authority—a line of priest-princes that began with Adam and continued through Seth, Enoch, Noah, and now Abraham.
This moment wasn’t random. It was the sacred continuation of a legacy. Abraham’s bold faith didn’t come out of nowhere—it was forged through decades of discipleship under men who had walked with God face to face.
And centuries later, the book of Hebrews would reveal that this priesthood, outside the line of Levi, was always pointing forward—to Christ, the true and eternal priest in the order of Melchizedek.
Melchizedek: Shem, Priest‑Prince of the Most High — A Technical Examination
1. Introduction
Melchizedek’s brief biblical appearance (Genesis 14:18–20) has generated rich exegetical discussion. Identified as “king of Salem” and “priest of God Most High,” he blesses Abraham and receives tithes—yet his origins remain unrecorded. This paper explores the traditional identification of Melchizedek with Shem, son of Noah, through biblical, rabbinic, historical, and cultural evidence.
2. Biblical Texts
- Genesis 14:18–20: Melchizedek brings bread and wine, blesses Abraham, and Abraham offers him a tithe.
- Psalm 110:4: “You are a priest forever, after the order of Melchizedek.”
- Hebrews 7:3: Melchizedek is “without father or mother, without genealogy”—a theological statement, not genealogical silence.
3. Chronological Overlap
Using traditional chronologies (e.g., Ussher), lifespans overlapped: Noah lived from ~2948 to 1998 BCE, Shem from ~2446 to 1846 BCE, and Abraham was born ~1948 BCE. Abraham’s early years—292 years after the flood—overlapped with Noah’s last 58 years and Shem’s remaining ~500 years (weareisrael.org, sacred-texts.com).
4. Rabbinic & Extra-Biblical Evidence
- Talmud (Nedarim 32b): Identifies Melchizedek as Shem, noting the priesthood transferred to Abraham due to Melchizedek’s blessing (halakhah.com).
- Genesis Rabbah: Midrashic tradition affirming the identity.
- Targumim (Yonathan, Yerushalmi): Translate Melchizedek as Shem.
- Chabad.org: Notes Shem as a spiritual giant, Torah teacher, and priest (chabad.org).
- Book of Jasher (9:5–6): Abraham lived with Noah and Shem for 39 years (sacred-texts.com).
- Jewish Encyclopedia: Notes Shem ruled in Salem and served as priest (jewishencyclopedia.com).
5. Cultural & Oral Context
These patriarchs lived in extended family structures. Adam lived long enough to know Lamech, father of Noah, allowing for a continuous oral transmission of God’s story. Lamech may have heard about Eden from Adam himself. Abraham inherited this preserved memory, living with Noah and Shem during his formative years.
6. Priestly-Prince Succession
Before the Law of Moses, the Bible portrays a sacred priest-prince lineage: Adam → Seth → Enoch → Noah → Shem → Abraham. These men were entrusted with divine revelation and leadership. In Genesis 14, Melchizedek (Shem) blesses Abraham and receives tithes, transferring that priestly role.
7. Line of Faith
Abraham didn’t invent faith—he received it through men like Noah and Shem. These were not mythological figures but living witnesses of God’s power and mercy. The line of faith was a lived tradition—one generation declaring God’s works to the next. Books like Jasher and Jubilees emphasize this multi-generational faith transmission.
8. Literary Omission of Genealogy
Hebrews 7 uses the absence of Melchizedek’s genealogy in Genesis as a literary device—not a literal statement that he had no parents. Ancient readers understood this technique. The omission helps portray Melchizedek as a priest “outside the law,” like Christ. But the rabbis never doubted he was Shem.
9. Early Christian Reception
Hebrews presents Melchizedek typologically. Jewish Christians familiar with tradition would have recognized Melchizedek as Shem and simultaneously seen him as a prophetic shadow of Christ—whose priesthood did not arise from Levi, but from divine appointment.
10. Addressing Counter-Views
Some suggest Melchizedek was an angel or pre-incarnate Christ. These interpretations arise mostly from modern Western theological traditions unfamiliar with Jewish oral culture. The Hebrew model allows layered identities. Melchizedek was a historical figure (Shem) and a prophetic symbol (Christ-like priest).
11. Conclusion
Melchizedek was Shem—patriarch, priest, and king. He carried the divine testimony from the world before the flood and passed it to Abraham. This was no isolated moment. It was a sacred handoff within a royal priesthood stretching back to Eden and forward to Christ. The priesthood of Melchizedek, as fulfilled in Jesus, is not disconnected from history—it is built upon it.
Sources & Links
Is It Really Compassion to Let Everyone In?
Is It Really Compassion to Let Everyone In?
“Where is your compassion?”
That’s the question often thrown at anyone who believes in border security or the deportation of illegal immigrants – especially those with criminal records.
The argument goes like this:
We should welcome everyone because people matter.
Keeping people out is selfish and un-Christlike.
True compassion means opening our borders and letting them stay.
But is that really true compassion? Or is it shortsighted empathy that feels good today but harms millions tomorrow?
The Founders’ Vision of Compassion
America’s Founders believed in compassion. They saw each human as created equal by God, endowed with unalienable rights. But their compassion was grounded in responsibility and sustainability.
Thomas Jefferson said:
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.”
That same logic applies to immigration. Is it compassionate to force citizens to fund the welfare, medical costs, housing, and policing required by uncontrolled immigration – especially when it places their own families and communities at risk?
Or is it compassionate to protect your citizens first, build a strong, free, thriving nation, and then help others from a place of strength rather than weakness?
Short-Term Feelings vs. Long-Term Compassion
Let’s be honest. It feels compassionate to let everyone in. It makes for good Instagram posts. It soothes guilt. It avoids confrontation.
But what happens long-term?
- âś… Communities are overwhelmed. Hospitals close maternity wards under financial strain. Schools collapse under overcrowding. Social services designed for citizens cannot keep up.
- ✅ Wages stagnate. Low-skilled American workers – often immigrants themselves who came legally – are forced to compete against illegal labor willing to work off-books for less.
- âś… Crime rises. Not all illegal immigrants commit violent crimes. But a portion do. If even 1% commit felonies, that is thousands of innocent victims who would not have suffered if immigration laws were enforced.
- âś… National unity fractures. Compassion turns into resentment as citizens watch their government prioritize non-citizens over their own veterans, elderly, and children.
True Compassion: Strong Borders, Strong Nation
If Trump’s second term focuses on:
- Removing illegal immigrants with criminal records
- Securing the border to end the cartel human trafficking pipeline
- Enforcing laws fairly while expanding legal immigration based on merit and national needs
…then this is not cruelty. It is compassion rightly ordered.
Here’s why:
- ✔️ It protects citizens. The first duty of any government is to its own people. Without that, it is no government at all.
- ✔️ It builds a nation worth immigrating to. A collapsing economy, overwhelmed hospitals, and rising crime help no one.
- ✔️ It preserves dignity. Illegal immigrants live in fear, exploited for labor, unable to participate fully in American life. A strong legal system upholds their dignity by ending that exploitation.
- ✔️ It helps future generations. Children raised in a stable, safe, economically strong nation grow up to invent, build, and lead – creating advancements that bless the entire world.
Compassion That Lasts
Those accusing border security advocates of lacking compassion often confuse emotion with virtue. It feels good to welcome, but true virtue asks:
What are the consequences?
Who pays the cost?
Will this help or harm the people entrusted to my care?
Biblically, compassion begins with family and community. 1 Timothy 5:8 warns:
“But if anyone does not provide for his own, and especially for those of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.”
That provision extends outward, but it starts at home.
America’s Founders Understood This
They built a system designed to bless generations. By securing borders, enforcing immigration law, and building economic strength, we create a nation that can:
- âś… Bless the world with trade and innovation
- âś… Send missionaries and humanitarian aid abroad
- âś… Receive legal immigrants who integrate and thrive
Compassion rooted in founding principles builds freedom, dignity, and prosperity – not just for us, but for the world.
Invitation to Think
True compassion isn’t opening the door without wisdom.
It’s building a home so strong, so free, so virtuous, and so prosperous that when you open the door, you have something worth sharing.
That’s what Trump’s second term vision seeks to restore. And that’s what the Founders intended all along.
 
							
					
															Polygamy in the Bible
Polygamy in the Bible
Polygamy in the Bible: A Complex Blessing
Polygamy often raises eyebrows in modern discussions of biblical morality, yet the Scriptures themselves treat it with surprising nuance. While never explicitly commanded, polygamy appears multiple times in Scripture—sometimes as a cultural reality, and other times with what seems to be divine allowance or even blessing.
Old Testament Examples
- Jacob, Leah, Rachel… and Two More
 In Genesis 29:31–30:24, Jacob marries sisters Leah and Rachel, and later has children with their maidservants. Though the family dynamic is messy and full of strife, God is intimately involved—opening wombs, giving children, and building the twelve tribes of Israel through this very household.
- David’s God-Given Wives
 In 2 Samuel 12:8, the prophet Nathan conveys a striking word from God to David:
 “I gave your master’s house to you, and your master’s wives into your arms… And if all this had been too little, I would have given you even more.” The implication is startling—David’s multiple wives are not condemned here, but are part of God’s provision.
- Solomon’s Excess
 1 Kings 11:3–4 records Solomon’s hundreds of wives and concubines. While Scripture does condemn Solomon’s eventual idolatry influenced by his wives, God had still granted him immense wisdom and blessing beforehand. The issue isn’t quantity—it’s compromise of faith.
- Law for Additional Wives
 In Exodus 21:10, Mosaic law includes instructions for a man who takes another wife:
 “He must not deprive the first one of her food, clothing and marital rights.” The law doesn’t forbid polygamy—it regulates fairness within it.
New Testament Direction
The New Testament shifts the focus. It emphasizes faithfulness, character, and spiritual leadership—but doesn’t offer a direct condemnation of polygamy.
- 1 Timothy 3:2: “Now the overseer is to be above reproach, faithful to his wife…”
- Titus 1:6: “An elder must be blameless, faithful to his wife…”
These verses elevate monogamy as a standard for leadership, not as a universal requirement for all believers.
What Can We Conclude?
The Bible does not condemn polygamy, nor does it explicitly endorse it as a divine ideal. Instead, it presents it as a real part of human relationships in certain times and cultures—often accompanied by blessings, and just as often followed by human frailty, jealousy, or spiritual decline.
Polygamy in Scripture is not portrayed as sin, but it is often the backdrop for sin. And like many blessings, when received without faith or handled without wisdom, it can lead to brokenness.
Rather than judging ancient lives through modern lenses, it’s better to reflect on the heart of the matter: God desires faithful, loving, and covenantal relationships. Whether monogamous or polygamous, when human relationships lose sight of the One who gave the gift, the blessing often turns to burden.
 
							
					
															Jesus Drank Wine
Jesus Drank Wine
11 Reasons Alcohol Might Just Be… Biblical
(A lightly cheerful list you can read with a smile—and a Bible in hand)
1. Jesus drank wine.
“I tell you I will not drink again of this fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new with you in My Father’s kingdom.”
— Matthew 26:29
Yep. Real wine. And He plans to have a glass with us in the Kingdom.
2. Jesus gave wine to others.
“Drink of it, all of you, for this is My blood of the covenant…”
— Matthew 26:26–30
At the Last Supper, He served the cup—not just symbolically, but literally.
3. Jesus made more wine when they ran out.
— John 2:1–11
Not just any wine. Good wine. And the guests had already had plenty. Miracle #1: A wedding wine upgrade.
4. The Apostle Paul prescribed it.
“No longer drink only water, but use a little wine for the sake of your stomach and your frequent ailments.”
— 1 Timothy 5:23
Apostle-approved. Doctor-endorsed. Moderation encouraged.
5. It’s recommended for stress relief.
“Give strong drink to the one who is perishing, and wine to those in bitter distress.”
— Proverbs 31:6
Sometimes you don’t need a lecture—you need a little peace in a glass.
6. God approves it for celebration.
“Go, eat your bread with joy, and drink your wine with a merry heart, for God has already approved what you do.”
— Ecclesiastes 9:7
That’s right—cheers, with permission.
7. Even church leaders can have some.
“Deacons… must not be addicted to much wine.”
— 1 Timothy 3:8
Note: It doesn’t say no wine. It says not too much. Big difference.
8. Little old church ladies are in the clear too.
“Older women… not slanderers or slaves to much wine.”
— Titus 2:3
So yes—Grandma can sip her merlot while mentoring the younger women.
9. It’s perfect for after church.
“Eat the fat and drink sweet wine… for the joy of the Lord is your strength.”
— Nehemiah 8:10
A holy day? That calls for a holy toast.
10. It was part of Old Testament worship.
“Their drink offerings shall be… a half hin of wine for a bull…”
— Numbers 28:14
God didn’t just allow it—He expected it on the altar.
11. It’s great for the church picnic.
“Buy whatever your heart desires: oxen, sheep, wine, or strong drink… and rejoice, you and your household.”
— Deuteronomy 14:26
There’s a reason potlucks are biblical.
 
							
					
															When Church Moved Into the Living Room
When Church Moved Into the Living Room
When Church Moved Into the Living Room
A Personal Story of Rediscovering Real Faith
In those days, church was just “doing church.”
We’d get up on Sunday morning, put on our good clothes, go listen to five songs and a lecture, then come home.
I’m sure there were sermons that were inspiring.
We got to know a few people.
But nothing really stuck.
There had to be more.
This couldn’t possibly be all that God intended for Christianity.
It couldn’t possibly be all there is to faith.
It couldn’t possibly be all there is to God.
I wanted to know Him in a real way.
I wanted to know who He really is.
But the church had no real life.
The singing was polished, the preaching was passionate, the programs were well-run—
But it all felt hollow.
Relationships were shallow.
And if we didn’t return, the relationships faded.
We visited other churches—some better than others.
We found great preachers, good people.
But that sense of family, of purpose, of living faith… it wasn’t there.
So we stepped away.
A few families, like ours, were frustrated with how church was operating.
It wasn’t that we were bitter or rebellious—
We just couldn’t find what our hearts were hungry for.
We knew we needed spiritual connection, even if it didn’t come in the form we were used to.
So we got together.
Just a couple families—husbands, wives, and kids.
We started simply:
Sharing some of our struggles, then opening the Bible together.
There were no sermons.
No structured curriculum.
Usually someone would show up with a scripture or topic on their heart,
And we’d just start talking.
It was informal, but not shallow.
Spirit-led, but not chaotic.
We met on Sunday afternoons or evenings—
When everyone could relax, bring a snack, and bring their full selves.
And something began to grow.
Not just spiritual insight—
But relationships.
The kind traditional church often doesn’t have room for.
We shared our homes, our kids, our food, and our lives.
Over time, some of those relationships became the most meaningful we’ve ever had.
We talked about marriage, child-rearing, money, fear, calling, and failure.
We dug into the Bible—
Not because someone told us to,
But because we wanted to.
Some weeks it felt like the Holy Spirit Himself was guiding our questions,
Revealing truth none of us expected.
I started to pray more.
And I started to know God in ways I never had before.
My faith became real and personal in a way that never happened for me in the structure of Sunday services.
“I’ve grown more in the past few months sitting in this living room than in years of sermons.”
That season changed me.
It made me hungry for that kind of shared spiritual life all the time.
I’ve looked for it since,
But often “home church” ends up being a smaller version of the very system we were stepping away from.
What we had back then wasn’t about creating a church or running a ministry—
It was simply a space to be the Church together.
We didn’t need a platform or a plan.
We needed presence—God’s, and each other’s.
We needed time, conversation, and the freedom to ask questions out loud.
And the Spirit met us there.
I can read the Bible alone—
And every preacher says we need to.
But nothing compares to opening the Scriptures together.
Learning, digging, praying, struggling, listening…
It is so much more than daily devotions alone and lost.
The house of the Lord is built using all of us as stones.
Faith was never intended to be walked alone.
That’s why I believe so strongly in this call to rediscover participatory, Spirit-led teaching.
I’ve lived it.
I’ve tasted it.
And once you’ve experienced it, you know—
This is what Church was meant to be.